From: Pete on
JPEGs sent via e-mail. Sorry for delay, hunger interrupted editing. I'm
going to use more kitchen skills to combine water kettle tea and milk
(hopefully in the correct sequence).

Pete


From: Paul Furman on
Pete wrote:
> JPEGs sent via e-mail.

That's pretty impressive axial CA cleanup.
I tried to match the sharpening:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/4381955319/sizes/o/
top is from lightroom, bottom with Capture NX2,
left is f/8, right is f/2.8
original files here:
http://www.edgehill.net/1/temp//_0039097.NEF
http://www.edgehill.net/1/temp//_0039096.NEF

> f/8 NEF is more than good enough. f/2.8 needed 60% axial CA correction to
> remove magenta from wires on RHS. With lateral and axial CA turned off I can
> see the problem, but why would anyone turn off auto lateral CA?
>
> NX2 runs the same, or very similar, algorithms as the camera (one hell of a
> lot more slowly), that's one reason I use it. The other reason is it lets me
> learn how to set the camera so I rarely need to use the editor for anything
> other than cropping/resizing/printer profile. The camera JPEG output is more
> than good enough for cropping, resizing, and/or printing in the high street
> lab.
From: Paul Furman on
....not to put too fine a point on it but...

Paul Furman wrote:
> Pete wrote:
>> JPEGs sent via e-mail.
>
> That's pretty impressive axial CA cleanup.

So, I downloaded a trial version of Capture NX2 and it does work nicely
for this. There is still a cyan fringe but much better.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/4383714868/sizes/o/
-that's just working off the jpeg, I never saved NEFs, out of spite for
Nikon's software <g>.

> I tried to match the sharpening:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/4381955319/sizes/o/

Note how the top LR examples alias/moire the purple into alternating
bands of red & blue where NX gives a smooth edge. NX does leave red in
the fringing, it only takes out the blues. It doesn't touch the yellow
green axial fringing in the background but that's less objectionable to
start with.


> top is from lightroom, bottom with Capture NX2,
> left is f/8, right is f/2.8
> original files here:
> http://www.edgehill.net/1/temp//_0039097.NEF
> http://www.edgehill.net/1/temp//_0039096.NEF
>
>> f/8 NEF is more than good enough. f/2.8 needed 60% axial CA correction to
>> remove magenta from wires on RHS. With lateral and axial CA turned off
>> I can
>> see the problem, but why would anyone turn off auto lateral CA?
>>
>> NX2 runs the same, or very similar, algorithms as the camera (one hell
>> of a
>> lot more slowly), that's one reason I use it. The other reason is it
>> lets me
>> learn how to set the camera so I rarely need to use the editor for
>> anything
>> other than cropping/resizing/printer profile. The camera JPEG output
>> is more
>> than good enough for cropping, resizing, and/or printing in the high
>> street
>> lab.

From: Pete on
Paul Furman wrote:
> ...not to put too fine a point on it but...
>
> Paul Furman wrote:
>> Pete wrote:
>>> JPEGs sent via e-mail.
>>
>> That's pretty impressive axial CA cleanup.
>
> So, I downloaded a trial version of Capture NX2 and it does work nicely
> for this. There is still a cyan fringe but much better.
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/4383714868/sizes/o/
> -that's just working off the jpeg, I never saved NEFs, out of spite for
> Nikon's software <g>.

Nicely put. Now I've learnt NX2 it does what I want and with minimal effort,
but if they start building camera firmware to the same standard as their
external software I shall give up photography and learn to draw with
crayons.

Pete