From: mmyvusenet on
Hello:

I did a change in the photo, and maybe now It is much better:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4839458992/

and in the afternoon I took this other photo:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4841039749/

Thanks for your technical comments about photography.

--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com


From: Nervous Nick on
On Jul 29, 5:23 pm, "mmyvusenet" <mmyvuse...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I did a change in the photo, and maybe now It is much better:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4839458992/
>
> and in the afternoon I took this other photo:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4841039749/
>
> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>
> --
> MMYVhttp://www.mmyv.com

I don't think you can ever improve the composition of that photo,
unless you superimposed the flags onto a fireworks display or a cage
full of dead parrots or something.

All I see is just a few flags and nondescript buildings. Maybe you
had to be there. If you were trying to express the utter, uninspired
bleakness of your pathetic existence, then maybe you succeeded.
From: Wolfgang Weasleburg on
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:36:31 -0700 (PDT), Nervous Nick
<nervous.nick(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Jul 29, 5:23�pm, "mmyvusenet" <mmyvuse...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> Hello:
>>
>> I did a change in the photo, and maybe now It is much better:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4839458992/
>>
>> and in the afternoon I took this other photo:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4841039749/
>>
>> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>>
>> --
>> MMYVhttp://www.mmyv.com
>
>I don't think you can ever improve the composition of that photo,
>unless you superimposed the flags onto a fireworks display or a cage
>full of dead parrots or something.
>
>All I see is just a few flags and nondescript buildings. Maybe you
>had to be there. If you were trying to express the utter, uninspired
>bleakness of your pathetic existence, then maybe you succeeded.

I am reminded of when they started to make computers user-friendly. The net
was nice before that. Or when they finally wrote the Network Connection
Wizard for Windows so that people didn't have to manually configure their
modem init strings,TCP/IP, DNS, FIFO buffer and COM-port settings, etc. I
recall when being a beta-tester for MSNetwork the 7 page document they sent
to everyone on how to properly configure a dial-up connection. They wanted
to make it part of the first Win95 manual. We all laughed about how "easy"
they made it. People who could actually think for themselves were the only
ones on the net back then. It was nice.

Today anyone can own a camera and think they are a photographer or might
become one if they just keep trying. These newsgroups are crawling wall to
wall with them. Some are just way more obvious about it than others.

From: mmyvusenet on
"Wolfgang Weasleburg" <wweasleburg(a)yahoo.com> escribi� en el mensaje de
noticias:n6f45695ko5748hbvrq3d57ohdv2e11hte(a)4ax.com...
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:36:31 -0700 (PDT), Nervous Nick
> <nervous.nick(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Jul 29, 5:23 pm, "mmyvusenet" <mmyvuse...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> Hello:
>>>
>>> I did a change in the photo, and maybe now It is much better:
>>>
>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4839458992/
>>>
>>> and in the afternoon I took this other photo:
>>>
>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4841039749/
>>>
>>> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>>>
>>> --
>>> MMYVhttp://www.mmyv.com
>>
>>I don't think you can ever improve the composition of that photo,
>>unless you superimposed the flags onto a fireworks display or a cage
>>full of dead parrots or something.
>>
>>All I see is just a few flags and nondescript buildings. Maybe you
>>had to be there. If you were trying to express the utter, uninspired
>>bleakness of your pathetic existence, then maybe you succeeded.
>
> I am reminded of when they started to make computers user-friendly. The
> net
> was nice before that. Or when they finally wrote the Network Connection
> Wizard for Windows so that people didn't have to manually configure their
> modem init strings,TCP/IP, DNS, FIFO buffer and COM-port settings, etc. I
> recall when being a beta-tester for MSNetwork the 7 page document they
> sent
> to everyone on how to properly configure a dial-up connection. They wanted
> to make it part of the first Win95 manual. We all laughed about how "easy"
> they made it. People who could actually think for themselves were the only
> ones on the net back then. It was nice.
>
> Today anyone can own a camera and think they are a photographer or might
> become one if they just keep trying. These newsgroups are crawling wall to
> wall with them. Some are just way more obvious about it than others.


Hello, with the intention of amplifying the photos, and show something of
the feeling at this time, I added a video:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4843833687/

--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com


From: Nervous Nick on
On Jul 30, 2:52 pm, "mmyvusenet" <mmyvuse...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
> "Wolfgang Weasleburg" <wweasleb...(a)yahoo.com> escribió en el mensaje de
> noticias:n6f45695ko5748hbvrq3d57ohdv2e11...(a)4ax.com...
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:36:31 -0700 (PDT), Nervous Nick
> > <nervous.n...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>On Jul 29, 5:23 pm, "mmyvusenet" <mmyvuse...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>> Hello:
>
> >>> I did a change in the photo, and maybe now It is much better:
>
> >>>http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4839458992/
>
> >>> and in the afternoon I took this other photo:
>
> >>>http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4841039749/
>
> >>> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>
> >>> --
> >>> MMYVhttp://www.mmyv.com
>
> >>I don't think you can ever improve the composition of that photo,
> >>unless you superimposed the flags onto a fireworks display or a cage
> >>full of dead parrots or something.
>
> >>All I see is just a few flags and nondescript buildings.  Maybe you
> >>had to be there.  If you were trying to express the utter, uninspired
> >>bleakness of your pathetic existence, then maybe you succeeded.
>
> > I am reminded of when they started to make computers user-friendly. The
> > net
> > was nice before that. Or when they finally wrote the Network Connection
> > Wizard for Windows so that people didn't have to manually configure their
> > modem init strings,TCP/IP, DNS, FIFO buffer and COM-port settings, etc. I
> > recall when being a beta-tester for MSNetwork the 7 page document they
> > sent
> > to everyone on how to properly configure a dial-up connection. They wanted
> > to make it part of the first Win95 manual. We all laughed about how "easy"
> > they made it. People who could actually think for themselves were the only
> > ones on the net back then. It was nice.
>
> > Today anyone can own a camera and think they are a photographer or might
> > become one if they just keep trying. These newsgroups are crawling wall to
> > wall with them. Some are just way more obvious about it than others.
>
> Hello, with the intention of amplifying the photos, and show something of
> the feeling at this time, I added a video:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4843833687/
>

I think you somehow left out the first ten minutes of it.

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: fung foo sparrow
Next: New photo