Anyone using Bible Pro for raw images?
in [Photography]
|
From: Alex Monro on 18 Jun 2007 08:06 Brian wrote: > Just curious if anyone is using the Bible Pro software for working > with raw images. Been looking around at different apps and like what > I read about theirs, but I'd like to get some feedback from anyone > that's using it or has used it. The pros or cons from you. > I tried downloading the free trial version (for Linux), but discovered it didn't support my Fuji S9500. It did support my Olympud SP-350 compact though, so I had a bit of a play. Seems fairly comprehensive, but the workflow took a bit of getting my head around, and I don't want to keep chopping and changing, so I'm back to UFRaw and The GIMP. Maybe you should try downloading the trial version from http://www.bibblelabs.com/get.html
From: Akiralx on 20 Jun 2007 09:36 "Brian" <brian(a)home.net> wrote in message news:iltb735cj0ct21m350lgoako0upvnjpj8v(a)4ax.com... > Just curious if anyone is using the Bible Pro software for working > with raw images. Been looking around at different apps and like what > I read about theirs, but I'd like to get some feedback from anyone > that's using it or has used it. The pros or cons from you. You may find this useful, especially if you shoot Nikon: http://www.bythom.com/raw.htm
From: PixelPix on 20 Jun 2007 16:59 On Jun 18, 1:12 pm, Brian <b...(a)home.net> wrote: > Just curious if anyone is using the Bible Pro software for working > with raw images. Been looking around at different apps and like what > I read about theirs, but I'd like to get some feedback from anyone > that's using it or has used it. The pros or cons from you. > > Thanks. > > Brian Bibble has never had the image quality for me..... it just can't produce the same quality, highly detailed results that I get with Capture One..... then again, nothing that I have used can (I have tried everything BTW) .... even Adobe's new Lightroom fails to match Capture One's IQ. As another poster said... download the trial versions first and see what they produce. Cheers Rusty My Photography Help Blog: http://blog.pixelpix.com.au
From: Koekje on 20 Jun 2007 17:57 PixelPix enlightened us with: > Bibble has never had the image quality for me..... it just can't > produce the same quality, highly detailed results that I get with > Capture One..... IMO Bibble also produces a lower quality than Digikam. Koekje
From: Noons on 21 Jun 2007 03:27
On Jun 21, 6:59 am, PixelPix <m...(a)pixelpix.com.au> wrote: > Bibble has never had the image quality for me..... it just can't > produce the same quality, highly detailed results that I get with > Capture One..... then again, nothing that I have used can (I have > tried everything BTW) .... even Adobe's new Lightroom fails to match > Capture One's IQ. > > As another poster said... download the trial versions first and see > what they produce. is that the case as well for captureone LE? Or is it only the super-expensive Pro version? |