From: RichA on
Dear camera makers; reducing releases of cameras in a recession makes
about as much sense as cutting back advertising to save money. All
you do is allow your competition to take (and keep) market share. If
the market has shrunk from 100 to 80 (arbitrary numbers) do think
being LESS visible is going to help your company?? You are now
fighting over a smaller pie, so get the F--- in there and produce
something.

From: Overseer on

"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5e868267-67b8-46dd-b7ff-c70e6aefdaaa(a)q32g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> Dear camera makers; reducing releases of cameras in a recession makes
> about as much sense as cutting back advertising to save money. All
> you do is allow your competition to take (and keep) market share. If
> the market has shrunk from 100 to 80 (arbitrary numbers) do think
> being LESS visible is going to help your company?? You are now
> fighting over a smaller pie, so get the F--- in there and produce
> something.
>
WOW, you must vote NDP (Canada's Socialists) too. Their plan is to spend
their way out of a deficit.




From: Ray Fischer on
RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>Dear camera makers; reducing releases of cameras in a recession makes
>about as much sense as cutting back advertising to save money.

Given that you're a stupid racist bigot I'd hardly think that you're
in the slightest bit qualified to make decisions about multinational
corporations' strategies.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net

From: Ray Fischer on
Overseer <anonymous(a)not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:
>
>"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:5e868267-67b8-46dd-b7ff-c70e6aefdaaa(a)q32g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>> Dear camera makers; reducing releases of cameras in a recession makes
>> about as much sense as cutting back advertising to save money. All
>> you do is allow your competition to take (and keep) market share. If
>> the market has shrunk from 100 to 80 (arbitrary numbers) do think
>> being LESS visible is going to help your company?? You are now
>> fighting over a smaller pie, so get the F--- in there and produce
>> something.
>>
>WOW, you must vote NDP (Canada's Socialists) too. Their plan is to spend
>their way out of a deficit.

In the US that's the plan of the GOP. As I recall it was Reagan who
first pushed the idea.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net

From: Drazic on
"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5e868267-67b8-46dd-b7ff-c70e6aefdaaa(a)q32g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> Dear camera makers; reducing releases of cameras in a recession makes
> about as much sense as cutting back advertising to save money. All
> you do is allow your competition to take (and keep) market share. If
> the market has shrunk from 100 to 80 (arbitrary numbers) do think
> being LESS visible is going to help your company?? You are now
> fighting over a smaller pie, so get the F--- in there and produce
> something.


I think it's more about the importance of releasing something that people
want/need, at a reasonable price.

To try and put it into perspective, people will pay more for a car with air
con, but they don't really care about digital climate control, as long as it
blows cold air when they need it. Sure digital climate control with
individual temperatures on each side looks good, but it doesn't really serve
a useful purpose.

Just out of interest, what do you want the camera's to do that they can't at
the moment?

It's not a dig, just interested.