Prev: this is frustrating
Next: ? about 90/8 Super Angulon
From: Thor Lancelot Simon on 28 Jul 2010 11:06
In article <i2pgmv$kh9$1(a)news.acm.uiuc.edu>,
Doug McDonald <mcdonald(a)scs.uiuc.edu.remove.invalid> wrote:
>On 7/26/2010 7:21 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>> In article<i2kuim$fa1$1(a)news.acm.uiuc.edu>,
>> Doug McDonald<mcdonald(a)scs.uiuc.edu.remove.invalid> wrote:
>>> But there is also tonal rendition and color rendition.
>>>
>>> I don't like any Fuji film. I don't like the color rendition.
>>>
>>> I used negative film. Kodak never made any 4x5 color negative that offers
>>> the critical rendition of greens that their 35 mm films do. It's not
>>> subtle. I consider green the most important color to
>>> get rigght, especially the differentition of nearby shades. The
>>
>> You are an idiot. It's the same emulsion!
>>
>
>No, I'm not an idiot. Go back and look at the data sheets. You will
>see that at times, looking at the data sheets, the same emulsion
>would be available in 35mm and in 4x5. But not necessarily available at
>the same time.

It is assuredly the same emulsion now; Kodak hardly makes any, and what
they make, they coat on most every format where they can sell a minimum
production run -- and some where they probably can't, like 8x10.

--
Thor Lancelot Simon tls(a)rek.tjls.com
"All of my opinions are consistent, but I cannot present them all
at once." -Jean-Jacques Rousseau, On The Social Contract
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: this is frustrating
Next: ? about 90/8 Super Angulon