From: Bowser on
We've all been waiting for an AF torture test in order to sort out the
men from the boys, and I think this may be it.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=34857419

Like I said, only a food would contest this shooter's results.
From: Peter on
"Bowser" <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote in message
news:hfvfq5hus2a1omlfirjmsdpvh8r8sl44rc(a)4ax.com...
> We've all been waiting for an AF torture test in order to sort out the
> men from the boys, and I think this may be it.
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=34857419
>
> Like I said, only a food would contest this shooter's results.


Escargot.

--
Peter

From: Me on
Bowser wrote:
> We've all been waiting for an AF torture test in order to sort out the
> men from the boys, and I think this may be it.
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=34857419
>
> Like I said, only a food would contest this shooter's results.
>
That's usually only considered to be food in France.
From: Charles Chase on
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:32:55 -0400, Bowser <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote:

>We've all been waiting for an AF torture test in order to sort out the
>men from the boys, and I think this may be it.
>
>http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=34857419
>
>Like I said, only a food would contest this shooter's results.

Only a fool would accept those results. If you look at the amount of
foreground that's in focus and the amount of background that's in focus,
then the camera clearly has back-focusing problems. Typical for any DSLR to
have front and back focusing problems. Put that into Google and you'll get
over 1 million hits from DSLR owners reporting this. Phase detection
methods may be faster but 95% of the time the focus is always off. I'd
rather use a camera that focuses accurately every time, those that use
contrast detection methods. What good is capturing 100 images if 95 of them
will be too blurry to print larger than 6"x4".

From: Bowser on
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:23:28 -0400, "Peter"
<peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:

>"Bowser" <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote in message
>news:hfvfq5hus2a1omlfirjmsdpvh8r8sl44rc(a)4ax.com...
>> We've all been waiting for an AF torture test in order to sort out the
>> men from the boys, and I think this may be it.
>>
>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=34857419
>>
>> Like I said, only a food would contest this shooter's results.
>
>
>Escargot.

Y'know, I even proofread this one. Eyes are failing me.