From: MikeWhy on
<stephe_k(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hnf5os$no6$1(a)news.albasani.net...
> David J. Littleboy wrote:
>> <stephe_k(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So shooting a hand held quick test of the very center of the lens on a
>>> different camera proves this Pentax can resolve enough for this pixel
>>> density to be useful beyond marketing numbers? OK, I'm sure you believe
>>> this :-)
>>
>> It clearly shows that there's no problem producing sharp images with MF
>> lenses at that pixel density, and that your claims of unsurmountable
>> problems are silly, unfounded BS.
>
> My only claim was this MP density isn't needed at the resolution these
> lenses have. I'd be shocked if you could see any difference in say a 30MP
> version of this same crop camera. You might be hard pressed to see
> improvement over a 20MP version. Did I say anywhere this would be a
> "unsurmountable problem"? What I posted was this MP density was likely
> chosen for marketing reasons rather than any performance concerns.
>
> Clearly you can use a sensor/film that is higher resolution than the lens
> without problems as far as resolution.

You're doing a great job, Stephanie. Heck, you browbeat me right out of
wasting my $10k with your very first post. For that, I thank you. I didn't
want to be bothered by real information anyway. Forget thesse guys. They're
too enamored of experience and technical expertise, not worthy of your
efforts. Testing! Phhhpt. What's that?


From: David J. Littleboy on

"MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> You're doing a great job, Stephanie. Heck, you browbeat me right out of
> wasting my $10k with your very first post. For that, I thank you. I didn't
> want to be bothered by real information anyway. Forget thesse guys.
> They're too enamored of experience and technical expertise, not worthy of
> your efforts. Testing! Phhhpt. What's that?

Really. Alan got into a snarkfest with this person a few days ago, and I
thought to drop him a note pointing out he was wasting his time. I need to
take my own advice...

--
David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan


From: Alfred Molon on
In article <4b9aaccd$0$1783$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au>,
dj_nme(a)optusnet.com.au says...

> Why do you really believe that this sort of consumer-level EVF would
> pass muster on a pro-level MF digital camera?

Why not? It's 800x600x3 and zoomable.
--

Alfred Molon
------------------------------
Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
From: Alfred Molon on
In article <4f97e$4b9b148d$546accd9$31063(a)cache90.multikabel.net>,
spamtrap(a)arumes.com says...
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:47:17 +0100, Alfred Molon wrote:
>
> > In article <e560e$4b9ab539$546accd9$13071(a)cache90.multikabel.net>,
> > spamtrap(a)arumes.com says...
> >> You don't even
> >> understand what the term "full frame CCD" refers to.
> >
> > Nope, you are not expressing yourself clearly.
> >
> > There are full frame transfer and interline transfer CCDs, but you are
> > talking about "full frame CCD", which is imprecise.
> >
> > With "full frame" cameras people usually refer to cameras with 24x36mm
> > sensors. See here
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-frame_digital_SLR
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge-coupled_device#Architecture

Also on that page they use the term "frame transfer" - you wrote "full
frame CCD". Lern to express yourself precisely.
--

Alfred Molon
------------------------------
Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
From: Robert Spanjaard on
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:06:30 +0100, Alfred Molon wrote:

> In article <4f97e$4b9b148d$546accd9$31063(a)cache90.multikabel.net>,
> spamtrap(a)arumes.com says...
>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:47:17 +0100, Alfred Molon wrote:
>>
>> > In article <e560e$4b9ab539$546accd9$13071(a)cache90.multikabel.net>,
>> > spamtrap(a)arumes.com says...
>> >> You don't even
>> >> understand what the term "full frame CCD" refers to.
>> >
>> > Nope, you are not expressing yourself clearly.
>> >
>> > There are full frame transfer and interline transfer CCDs, but you
>> > are talking about "full frame CCD", which is imprecise.
>> >
>> > With "full frame" cameras people usually refer to cameras with
>> > 24x36mm sensors. See here
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-frame_digital_SLR
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge-coupled_device#Architecture
>
> Also on that page they use the term "frame transfer" -

Which is not the same type of CCD as "full frame".

> you wrote "full frame CCD".

Because that's exactly what I was writing about.

> Lern to express yourself precisely.

I did.



--
Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com