Prev: Question about Nikon Battery charger MH-30 (for Nikon F5)
Next: SI 46.8 comments by Calvin Sambrook
From: Rich Andersen on 4 Jan 2010 07:32
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:23:48 -0500, John A. <john(a)nowhere.invalid> wrote:

>On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:11:14 -0800 (PST), Chrlz
><mark.thomas.7(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Off topic keeping-them-honest-troll-information follows:
>>
>>Just for the record, "Die Wahrheit" is, of course, the anti-DSLR troll
>>formerly known as Vern/Keoeeit/Dave Ingols/MartinS/etc. Here's a
>>picture of Keoeeit:
>>http://www.eotacforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=24769&p=300369#p300369
>>
>>And here's an old post from him including a list of his former aliases
>>and an admission of his behavior:
>>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/msg/7b2ff557caafe5bd?dmode=source
>>.. suffice to say he doesn't like to stick with one name, for very
>>obvious reasons.
>>
>>This latest tirade about christianity is just another giveaway - take
>>a look here at one of many similar postings from him (2nd post down):
>>http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=299200&page=4
>>
>>Vern/Keoeeit/DieW has often been asked for examples of his imaging
>>prowess. He has claimed that we are not worthy. But he did actually
>>post quite a few images back when he was a vigorous forum poster (not
>>so much now that he has been banned from just about every place he
>>went (hardly surprising)). And despite his attempts to delete all
>>evidence, some remain:
>>http://forums.steves-digicams.com/forums/attachment.php?id=96572
>>(Beetle macro - ok, but terribly over-processed)
>>http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/Image:Drop_a.jpg (Water droplet - this is
>>actually ok, but does seem to be showing CA/PF, even at that size..)
>>http://forums.steves-digicams.com/forums/attachment.php?id=96685 (IR
>>fox - "I'll admit it's not a very good photo...")
>>http://forums.steves-digicams.com/forums/attachment.php?id=96582
>>(Raccoons - sometimes content overcomes technical issues, but not
>>always..)
>>http://forums.steves-digicams.com/forums/attachment.php?id=96597
>>(Raccoons II...)
>>http://forums.steves-digicams.com/forums/attachment.php?id=97424 (nice
>>example of aliasing artefacts in the whiskers)
>>http://forums.steves-digicams.com/forums/attachment.php?id=99180
>>(Chipmunk - oversharpened and badly cropped)
>>http://forums.steves-digicams.com/forums/attachment.php?id=101398 (He
>>posted this as 'proof' of P&S low-light superiority.. go figure)
>>http://iz.carnegiemnh.org/cranefly/images/Photos/Limonia_immatura_by_Keoeeit.jpg
>>(crane fly)
>>http://forums.steves-digicams.com/forums/attachment.php?id=100233
>>(oversharpened geese panorama)
>>
>>If Vern/Keoeeit/Die Wahrheit has better ones, perhaps he might like to
>>post them? Otherwise, those will remain his legacy for all time..
>>
>>If he claims any of these *aren't* his, I'm happy to show how I know
>>they *are*.. But the only person who will debate that is the troll
>>himself.
>>
>>Happy New Year, keoeeit!
>
>Wow!
>
>All this time I thought his whole persona was synthesized for the
>purpose of trolling. Turns out he's a legitimate nutter.
>
>Kinda sad, really.

The only sad thing around here are trolls believing other trolls. No wait.
It gets sadder than that, it's trolls believing other trolls that also
promote the easily disproved psychoses that is christianity.

Now *that* is sad.

From: Chrlz on 4 Jan 2010 17:40
On Jan 4, 10:32 pm, Rich Andersen <rander...(a)spamfree.org> wrote:
> The only sad thing around here are trolls believing other trolls. No wait..
> It gets sadder than that...

And then there are those who make claims and then run away when asked
to back their statements up.

You know, like that they have done tests that show how inferior
plastic cameras are because of thermal characteristics...

http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/msg/2c9054901ce9ca1e?hl=en

It would be good if that person backed up their claim and showed
exactly how they *have* tested and proven that plastic cameras suffer
from thermal degradation of images. But it looks like they won't.

That's sad too. What do *you* think, Rich?
From: Noons on 5 Jan 2010 22:13
On Jan 2, 6:47 pm, Die Wahrheit <diewahrh...(a)somewherehonest.net>
wrote:

> >> Nice to see that sock-puppet net-stalker Mark Thomas is actually the troll
> >> known as John McWillams.
>
> >Is he now? Amazing...
>
> As well as you are, just another sock-puppet troll of the psychotic
> net-stalker (yahoo.com.au requires only a public proxy). If anyone uses the
> very same disjointed associations that the rest of you make, they too will
> come to the same conclusions that all three of you are the very same
> person. I'm surprised that you can't see that. Everyone else can.

All that is blatantly obvious is: anyone who doesn't agree with you is
immediately blamed for global warming and put into the same "troll"
basket. How old did you say you were? Don't bother answering,
everyone else knows.

> follow-up reset to something other than your main and favorite newsgroup,
> the one where you feel right at home, alt.morons

nevr posted there. but you will. oh: and bad spelling corrected
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Question about Nikon Battery charger MH-30 (for Nikon F5)
Next: SI 46.8 comments by Calvin Sambrook