My new photosite
in [Photography Tips]
|
From: Robert Coe on 29 May 2010 08:40 On Wed, 26 May 2010 06:33:59 -0500, Jeff Jones <jj197109671(a)mailinator.com> wrote: : On 26 May 2010 10:49:02 GMT, "Marco Struck" <nickh.temp(a)web.de> wrote: : : >Hi, : > : >I nearly finished my new photosite, at least all the photos are online, : >just a few details left to be done. Ofcourse I would like to have some : >viewers and comments, so feel invited to have a look and let me know if : >you like it. : > : >The Site is german, but I intentionally left the navigation and : >keywords in english, allowing international visitors to navigate. By : >clicking on the following link a random image will be presented to you. : >Select 1 of the 3 random thumbnails below, or the 2 possible next- and : >prev-links, or just click on the browse-link to get to the reversed : >chronological overview, which can be filtered by categories and tags on : >the left side. : > : >Hope you enjoy: : > : >http://zone23.net/ : > : > : >Greets, Marco. : : Lots of standard stock-photography. Overall grade about a C+, a few photos : I'd give a B- to, maybe even a B+ for one or two. : : Not bad. But in my browsing I didn't spot anything phenomenal either. : Though I didn't view them all, just a good sampling. At least you show a : good grasp and breadth of using a camera properly. That's much more than I : can say for any of the other dufusses (dufi) that post to these forums. Actually it's "dufis" (with a long "i" - dative plural). : At least you won't be damaging the visual centers of anyone's brains. : Unlike the rest in these newsgroups. I don't know how we can be expected to improve, unless you condescend to show us more of your own excellent work. I looked at some of the recent Shoot-Ins, and it appears that through some oversight you haven't been submitting anything lately. Why is that, I wonder. Bob
From: Marco Struck on 1 Jun 2010 07:44 Jeff Jones wrote: >On Wed, 26 May 2010 06:33:59 -0500, Jeff Jones ><jj197109671(a)mailinator.com> wrote: Hi, first I want to apologize for replying so lately. >>>Hope you enjoy: >>> >>>http://zone23.net/ >>> >>> >>>Greets, Marco. >> >>Lots of standard stock-photography. Overall grade about a C+, a few >>photos I'd give a B- to, maybe even a B+ for one or two. >> >>Not bad. But in my browsing I didn't spot anything phenomenal >>either. Though I didn't view them all, just a good sampling. At >>least you show a good grasp and breadth of using a camera properly. >>That's much more than I can say for any of the other dufusses >>(dufi) that post to these forums. At least you won't be damaging >>the visual centers of anyone's brains. Unlike the rest in these >>newsgroups. An overall fair and true statement, at least the part you're talking about my pictures. Thank you. >If you had either the waves or the jellyfish in better focus this >could have been a strong A-, but your eye for composition made it >work. On second look, a difficult call, it still works like it is. I >like it a lot but shouldn't. Technically a C-, artistically a strong >A- to almost an A. http://zone23.net/index.php?showimage=174 The funny thing about this picture is, that it made it's way into the gallery by fortuity. The Original is nearly black with a scheme of a dark grey jellyfish, extremely noisy in the dark tones. So I was just fooling around with the picture, raising brightness and contrast, when I discovered the colors in the picture, finally applying a noisefilter. There it is, a nice example why to use RAW-Format... ;-) >A strong A- because I'm a fan of Escher. >http://zone23.net/index.php?showimage=175 Same process as the jellyfish, but much better RAW-Material. I had to photograph into dark black-blue water, but didn't want to let those fishes escape without being photographed... >Good subject, but the composition was slightly off. >http://zone23.net/index.php?showimage=241 Absolutely. I am thinking about a new version with different cut-out and better lens- and exposure-correction. >The rest of these dolts could learn a lot about composition from you. >Even when a subject is lack-luster your eye for composition saves it. >(most of the time) Very perceptive and true, non-ironic. I need to find some more compelling subjects, therefore I am thinking about some projects to start with... but it will take a few years to present any results, because I need more time and equipment. Greets, Marco. -- http://zone23.net
From: Marco Struck on 1 Jun 2010 07:46 Michael J Davis schrieb: >But overall a pleasant set, combining simple record shots, racoons, >owls etc. with some good pictorial. Thank you very much, nice to hear that. :-) Greets, Marco. -- http:/zone23.net
From: Marco Struck on 1 Jun 2010 07:50 Paul Giverin: >I really liked your shots. Thank you. :-) Marco. -- http://zone23.net
From: Marco Struck on 1 Jun 2010 08:05 Tzortzakakis Dimitris schrieb: >>Hope you enjoy: >> >>http://zone23.net/ >> >Ja, richtig, sehr gut:-)Die Fotos sind eingezeichnet! Thank you very much, but you should say 'ausgezeichnet', since 'eingezeichnet' means 'drawn-in'... :-) Your name sounds greek, right? Ever been in Germany? Marco -- http://zone23.net
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Software for Panoramic photos?? Next: BBC podcast on photography and the law |