From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4aa86a3f$0$1625$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> Neil Harrington <not(a)home.today> wrote:
>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>> Giftzwerg <giftzwerg999(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> It's a harmless photo that means nothing. Too bad the guy died (the
>>>>> photographer probably didn't know this at the time).
>>>>
>>>>I'd like to see more pictures of dead journalists, though. Makes me
>>>>happy.
>>>
>>> Quite the murderous fascist, aren't you?
>>
>>Actually, fascists (capitalized or not) were never as brutal in
>>suppressing
>>journalists as communists always were.
>
> LOL! Revisionism is a favorite tactic of the totalitarians.
>
> --
> Ray Fischer
> rfischer(a)sonic.net
>
Lefttards are big the revisionist game, putz


From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4aa86789$0$1625$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> Bill Graham <weg9(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>>I am really pleased to find that Fox news reaches the citizens of Great
>>Britain. I wish we could get the BBC over here.....We only get a few clips
>>of it now and then. (Usually on our public broadcasting stations, which I
>>also watch frequently)
>
> You wouldn't like the BBC. They're far too objective an unbiased for
> the likes of you.
>
> --
> Ray Fischer
> rfischer(a)sonic.net
>
Liar


From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4aa866f9$0$1625$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> Bill Graham <weg9(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>>Viewers of Fox news get the opinions of the conservatives who comment on
>>the
>>news at Fox.
>
> And who consistently misrepresent the facts.
>
>> Few of the other news services have conservative commentators.
>
> If, by "conservative", you mean "ideological fanatics".
>
> --
> Ray Fischer
> rfischer(a)sonic.net
>
More BS from the peanut gallery


From: Chris H on
In message <1vednUpC3OWizjXXnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, Bill Graham
<weg9(a)comcast.net> writes
>> What the US does not realise is their way is not only not the only way
>> it is not the best way for many cultures and civilisations. In fact
>> most parts of the world (that have been civilised many centuries longer
>> than the US has existed) don't want a US style "democracy"
>
>Most have never had one.

Most have had a freedom the US has never known for a couple of
millennium.

>They have lived under restrictive religious leaders all of their lives,

Certainly not. You have clearly never travelled there. BTW until
recently the US was far more restrictive. Eg The Bible Belt and the
"deep South" are far more repressive.

> for several generations, so how would they know what true freedom is
>like?

They have had far more freedom until the last 50 years.

> They certainly didn't get it under the Soviets.

The Soviets were no different to the US in that respect except far fewer
Civilians were killed.

> I claim that once free, people will quickly learn to love it, and
>never look back....

They were free for several Millennium (BTW religion has only intruded
for the last 50 or so years) It is the US had has religious problems.

--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



From: Ray Fischer on
mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>To a lefttard, being a putz is more important that being truthful.

Ah yes another schmuck. [mikey] can do nothing more than name call anyone who
he doesn't agree with.
mikey4 in <h8a3pm$tln$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net