From: RichA on
Panasonic 45-200mm. $350 and this is the best they can do with a slow
zoom???!
Sony 16mm pancake. Downright awful. But it is cheap in the kit. Too
cheap.
Sony 18-55mm. Apparently the worst kit lens since Canon's original
18-55mm. Again, too cheap.
From: George Kerby on



On 7/18/10 10:06 PM, in article
0ea9b618-1d90-4a98-b1ef-f6cc5d050763(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, "RichA"
<rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Panasonic 45-200mm. $350 and this is the best they can do with a slow
> zoom???!
> Sony 16mm pancake. Downright awful. But it is cheap in the kit. Too
> cheap.
> Sony 18-55mm. Apparently the worst kit lens since Canon's original
> 18-55mm. Again, too cheap.

I found your self-portrait...

<http://tinypic.com/r/vx1y7r/3>

From: Peter on
"George Kerby" <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:C869C45C.3950A%ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com...
>
>
>
> On 7/18/10 10:06 PM, in article
> 0ea9b618-1d90-4a98-b1ef-f6cc5d050763(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, "RichA"
> <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Panasonic 45-200mm. $350 and this is the best they can do with a slow
>> zoom???!
>> Sony 16mm pancake. Downright awful. But it is cheap in the kit. Too
>> cheap.
>> Sony 18-55mm. Apparently the worst kit lens since Canon's original
>> 18-55mm. Again, too cheap.
>
> I found your self-portrait...
>
> <http://tinypic.com/r/vx1y7r/3>
>


There are some things we agree on.

--
Peter

From: George Kerby on



On 7/19/10 6:36 PM, in article
4c44e2c6$0$5494$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com, "Peter"
<peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:

> "George Kerby" <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:C869C45C.3950A%ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/18/10 10:06 PM, in article
>> 0ea9b618-1d90-4a98-b1ef-f6cc5d050763(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, "RichA"
>> <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Panasonic 45-200mm. $350 and this is the best they can do with a slow
>>> zoom???!
>>> Sony 16mm pancake. Downright awful. But it is cheap in the kit. Too
>>> cheap.
>>> Sony 18-55mm. Apparently the worst kit lens since Canon's original
>>> 18-55mm. Again, too cheap.
>>
>> I found your self-portrait...
>>
>> <http://tinypic.com/r/vx1y7r/3>
>>
>
>
> There are some things we agree on.

"It's an office party!"

;-)

From: Rich on
On Jul 19, 9:59 am, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/18/10 10:06 PM, in article
> 0ea9b618-1d90-4a98-b1ef-f6cc5d050...(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, "RichA"
>
> <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Panasonic 45-200mm.  $350 and this is the best they can do with a slow
> > zoom???!
> > Sony 16mm pancake.  Downright awful.  But it is cheap in the kit.  Too
> > cheap.
> > Sony 18-55mm.  Apparently the worst kit lens since Canon's original
> > 18-55mm.  Again, too cheap.
>
> I found your self-portrait...
>
> <http://tinypic.com/r/vx1y7r/3>

Sure the pink couch isn't yours?