|
Prev: Calumet?
Next: Wollensak Raptar LE-2(2) Lens
From: Alan Browne on 18 Mar 2007 16:26 What would a Sinar 4x5 with Rodenstock 105mm f/4.5, polaroid back and 9 negative holders be worth? http://www.lespac.com/picturebig.php?a=4964179&o=8704205 Reported to be in "good condition". Thanks, Alan -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
From: Pudentame on 18 Mar 2007 17:58 Alan Browne wrote: > > What would a Sinar 4x5 with Rodenstock 105mm f/4.5, polaroid back and 9 > negative holders be worth? > > http://www.lespac.com/picturebig.php?a=4964179&o=8704205 > > Reported to be in "good condition". > > Thanks, > Alan > Looks like a F1 w/lensboard ... can't see if the back is there, although I would assume it is (and I'd verify that with the seller). Camera $300 - $650 Lens $100 - $200 Polaroid Back $50 - $75 9 holders $100 - $150 Total: $550 - $1075 I'd say near the lower end of the range is more reasonable. I'm sure the seller would prefer the upper end. ;-D
From: Alan Browne on 18 Mar 2007 21:51 Pudentame wrote: > Alan Browne wrote: > >> >> What would a Sinar 4x5 with Rodenstock 105mm f/4.5, polaroid back and >> 9 negative holders be worth? >> >> http://www.lespac.com/picturebig.php?a=4964179&o=8704205 >> >> Reported to be in "good condition". > > Looks like a F1 w/lensboard ... can't see if the back is there, although > I would assume it is (and I'd verify that with the seller). > > Camera $300 - $650 > Lens $100 - $200 > Polaroid Back $50 - $75 > 9 holders $100 - $150 > > Total: $550 - $1075 > > I'd say near the lower end of the range is more reasonable. I'm sure the > seller would prefer the upper end. ;-D Thanks. He says it's "ready to work with", so I assume the back is there. He's asking $750 CAD. So seems reasonable. I'll cogitate a bit on that. I just have to find out who can develop 4x5 E-6 for me. If I have to go all the way downtown or do it myself, I doubt that I'd go for it. Also just bought a Nikon 9000 ED ... which these won't go into... Cheers, Alan -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
From: pico on 19 Mar 2007 16:15 "Alan Browne" <alan.browne(a)Freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote in message news:NUmLh.22192$YK6.254868(a)wagner.videotron.net... > He's asking $750 CAD. So seems reasonable. I'll cogitate a bit on that. That's nutz, over the top. It looks grungy as hell, and the film holders are wrecks. Ya know, you can get an equally functional Sinar Alpina for under $200?
From: Nicholas O. Lindan on 19 Mar 2007 17:34
> "Alan Browne" <alan.browne(a)Freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote in message > news:NUmLh.22192$YK6.254868(a)wagner.videotron.net > What would a Sinar 4x5 with Rodenstock 105mm f/4.5, polaroid back and 9 > negative holders be worth? > http://www.lespac.com/picturebig.php?a=4964179&o=8704205 A lot depends on the lens. I don't know of any 105mm/f4.5 Rodenstocks. A normal 105 won't cover 4x5, a wide angle f4.5 ~100mm lens is a ~$700-1,200 proposition. I would get some clarification - is it a Geronar, Grandagon, Sinaron, Sironar ...? Is it 105 or is it a 135 or 150. -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Meters http://www.darkroomautomation.com/index.htm n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com "pico" <pico(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message news:12vtrq9k935b9ae(a)news.supernews.com... > > >> He's asking $750 CAD. So seems reasonable. I'll cogitate a bit on that. > > That's nutz, over the top. It looks grungy as hell, and the film holders > are wrecks. > > Ya know, you can get an equally functional Sinar Alpina for under $200? > > > |