From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4aca304d$0$1599$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>
>>>>I did post the very information you are asking for.
>>>
>>> No you didn't.
>>>
>>>> Now you sad little man
>>>>go fid it yourself.
>>>
>>> Now the petulant little child is reduced to lying about what he actually
>>> posts.
>>>
>>You are the liar,
>
> "I know you are but what am I?"
>
> You can prove your statement by simply reposting your evidence or
> providing the article id of your original post. You won't, of course,
> because you cannot. You're just a whiny little brat who would rather
> lie than admit that you're wrong.
>
> --
You are a lying sack of ...... no I won't go there I will not stoop to the
level of the sad little man.
Simply because you *choose* not to read something I posted which would prove
you wrong you call me a liar.
This fact shows ray, what a pathetic person you truly are.
Like I said.....go find it yourself sad little putz.



From: Ray Fischer on
mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>
>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>news:4aca304d$0$1599$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>
>>>>>I did post the very information you are asking for.
>>>>
>>>> No you didn't.
>>>>
>>>>> Now you sad little man
>>>>>go fid it yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Now the petulant little child is reduced to lying about what he actually
>>>> posts.
>>>>
>>>You are the liar,
>>
>> "I know you are but what am I?"
>>
>> You can prove your statement by simply reposting your evidence or
>> providing the article id of your original post. You won't, of course,
>> because you cannot. You're just a whiny little brat who would rather
>> lie than admit that you're wrong.
>>
>You are a lying sack of ...... no I won't go there I will not stoop to the

More of the same pathetic whining, but no evidence.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net

From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4acaa8ce$0$1658$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>
>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>news:4aca304d$0$1599$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
>>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>>>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>I did post the very information you are asking for.
>>>>>
>>>>> No you didn't.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Now you sad little man
>>>>>>go fid it yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now the petulant little child is reduced to lying about what he
>>>>> actually
>>>>> posts.
>>>>>
>>>>You are the liar,
>>>
>>> "I know you are but what am I?"
>>>
>>> You can prove your statement by simply reposting your evidence or
>>> providing the article id of your original post. You won't, of course,
>>> because you cannot. You're just a whiny little brat who would rather
>>> lie than admit that you're wrong.
>>>
>>You are a lying sack of ...... no I won't go there I will not stoop to the
>
> More of the same pathetic whining, but no evidence.
>
more of the same sad little man, you must be a lonely person.


From: Ray Fischer on
mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>
>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>news:4acaa8ce$0$1658$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>>
>>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>>news:4aca304d$0$1599$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
>>>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>>>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>I did post the very information you are asking for.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No you didn't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now you sad little man
>>>>>>>go fid it yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now the petulant little child is reduced to lying about what he
>>>>>> actually
>>>>>> posts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>You are the liar,
>>>>
>>>> "I know you are but what am I?"
>>>>
>>>> You can prove your statement by simply reposting your evidence or
>>>> providing the article id of your original post. You won't, of course,
>>>> because you cannot. You're just a whiny little brat who would rather
>>>> lie than admit that you're wrong.
>>>>
>>>You are a lying sack of ...... no I won't go there I will not stoop to the
>>
>> More of the same pathetic whining, but no evidence.
>>
>more of the

Run along, child. You've been spanked again.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net

From: Bob Larter on
Ray Fischer wrote:
> Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>> Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> SMS wrote:
>>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>
>>>>>> Don't you think it's kind of hypocritical that on the one hand
>>>>>> right-wingers oppose abortion, calling it murder, and yet on the other
>>>>>> hand, they support the death penalty?
>>>>> Actually no. With abortion I can at least understand their opposition,
>>>>> even if I don't agree with it.
>>>>>
>>>>> At what number of weeks in the pregnancy would you say that abortion is
>>>>> no longer acceptable? Clearly few people would support it at 38 weeks.
>>>>> What about 27 weeks?
>>>> Given that my son was born at 26 weeks, & is now a perfectly healthy 8
>>>> year old, abortions as late as that do bother me a lot.
>>> Less than 1% of all abortions occur in the 3rd trimester and those few
>>> are almost always done for medical need.
>> In such cases, I don't have a problem with them.
>
> How generous of you to grant a woman a choice with her pregnancy.

It's not a matter of me 'granting' anything, it's just that late-term
abortions bother me. I don't question the right of a woman to have one.

>>>> That said, I
>>>> still believe that the woman's right to choose trumps the rights of the
>>>> foetus.
>>>>
>>>>> While their opposition to RU486 is pretty
>>>>> ridiculous, at least you can see where they are coming from in opposing
>>>>> abortion after the fetus is more than a few weeks old.
>>>> My personal dividing line is at the point where the foetus is viable
>>>> outside the womb. Currently, I think that's around 24 weeks.
>>> Only if you have a million dollars to spend on medical care. A more
>>> practical limit of viability would be around 33 weeks.
>> Not so. Here in Australia, where we have free, universal healthcare, my
>> son's birth & followup treatments didn't cost his mother or I a single cent.
>
> Somebody has to pay for it. 24-week preemies are VERY expensive and
> lifelong medical problems are a near certainty.

Nonetheless, his birth cost me nothing more than what I already
contribute to the Medicare system in taxes.


--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------