From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4ab5554c$0$1607$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>> BTW GWB won by the smallest margin in history yet claimed a "mandate".
>>>
>>Not the first time around.
>
> He just acted like he had a mandate.
>
>> Obama has only Obamas interest at heart. Wait
>>and see.
>
> You're a bank robber. "Wait and see."
>
> --
LOL


From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4ab555b8$0$1607$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>
>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>news:4ab51c73$0$1630$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
>>> Bill Graham <weg9(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>>>><stephe_k(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:h916ml$lne$3(a)news.albasani.net...
>>>
>>>>> Well I was pissed watching GWB spending BILLIONS on a war while giving
>>>>> MASSIVE tax breaks to the wealthy. I was pissed watching him do
>>>>> NOTHING
>>>>> other than watching the economy fail. Were you? Some of us didn't just
>>>>> "wake up" because a republican wasn't in the white house. If Obama had
>>>>> been handed a healthy country and done this, I'd be pissed right there
>>>>> with ya, but that isn't what happened.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stephanie
>>>>I still don't understand about these, "massive tax cuts to the wealthy".
>>>>the
>>>>last time I checked, the more money you make, the greater percentage you
>>>>have to pay, .....that's what the tax tables in the form 1040 tell
>>>>me.....
>>>
>>> That's the sort of ignorant thinking that gets rightards into trouble.
>>>
>>> There are many ways the wealthy get to pay lower taxes. Here's one:
>>>
>>> Long-term capital gains and dividends aren't taxed as regular income.
>>> It's a flat 15% even before you find any deductions. So, if you own a
>>> ton of stock that pays you $250,000/yr in dividends then you pay no more
>>> than 15% of that as income tax. If you are given $100,000,000 in
>>> stock by the company and you sell it a year later, you pay 15%.
>>>
>>> If you earn $150,000 as straight salary then you pay about twice as
>>> much.
>>>
>>> --
>>and if you are ray and have little to no stock you pay little or nothing.
>
> Awww. mikey is feeling cranky again because he's stupid. He doesn't
> know about taxes and stock dividends and assumes that others are as
> stupid as he is.
>
> --
LOL


From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4ab55678$0$1607$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>
>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>news:4ab51946$0$1630$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
>>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>>>> Neil Harrington <secret(a)illumnati.net> wrote:
>>>>>>"David Ruether" <d_ruether(a)thotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> "Neil Harrington" <secret(a)illumnati.net> wrote in message
>>>
>>>>>>>> Much the same with the latest ACORN scandal, which stunk so badly
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> even Democrats in Congress finally voted to stop funding ACORN. But
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> never even heard about it from ABC, CBS or NBC, did you?
>>>>>>> [Nonsense deleted...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What was shown on tape from a *few* ACORN locations (but where
>>>>>>> were the reportings of the ones that threw out these imposters?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What makes you think ANY of the ACORN offices did or would do any
>>>>>>differently from the ones on tape? ACORN is rotten and corrupt to the
>>>>>>core.
>>>>>
>>>>> If that's true then it must also be true of the Republican party given
>>>>> the number of Republicans who have been shown to be lying,
>>>>> philandering hypocrites.
>>>>
>>>>Just like the lefttards
>>>
>>> Never trust a man who gives online retorts with *no* substance.
>>> mikey in <h8rvun$1hb$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>
>>> --
>>Snip away ray
>
> Run away, hypocrite.
>
> It's always so easy to argue against you rightards jut by throwing
> your own words back at you.
>
> --
ok got it, which post are you referring to? or can't you post the entire
text here.


From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4ab556db$0$1607$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>
>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>news:4ab5199f$0$1630$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
>>> Neil Harrington <not(a)home.today> wrote:
>>>>"Walter Banks" <walter(a)bytecraft.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>>>> All the Canadian patients who come to the US for necessary
>>>>> health care have the costs paid for by the Canadian health
>>>>> care system. That includes elective procedures.
>>>>
>>>>No, I don't think so.
>>>
>>> You don't think.
>>>
>>>>> The spending in Canada is about half per person of the
>>>>> US health costs.
>>>>
>>>>Because it's rationed.
>>>
>>> That's a bald-faced lie.
>>>
>>> It's the US that rations health care. People die as a result.
>>>
>>> --
>>Prove it ray.
>
> Will you pay attention this time, rightard?
>
> The US ranks about 35th of nation for lie expectancy.
> It's way down the list for infant mortality.
>
> 40,000,000+ people have no health insurance.
> Medical expenses are the single biggest factor in personal
> bankruptcies.
>
>
> --
Thank you lefttard for your reply


From: mikey4 on

"John A." <john(a)nowhere.invalid> wrote in message
news:mglab55g7uqk6uvbho6hssfrbm8m76hc4a(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:35:47 -0500, "mikey4" <lakediver(a)dd..net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>><stephe_k(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:h936hj$lcl$3(a)news.albasani.net...
>>> mikey4 wrote:
>>>> <stephe_k(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:h916ml$lne$3(a)news.albasani.net...
>>>>> mikey4 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> People are pissed because "they" have finely woke up to the fact that
>>>>>> the "government" is out of control and has been for a very long time.
>>>>> Well I was pissed watching GWB spending BILLIONS on a war while giving
>>>>> MASSIVE tax breaks to the wealthy. I was pissed watching him do
>>>>> NOTHING
>>>>> other than watching the economy fail. Were you? Some of us didn't just
>>>>> "wake up" because a republican wasn't in the white house. If Obama had
>>>>> been handed a healthy country and done this, I'd be pissed right there
>>>>> with ya, but that isn't what happened.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stephanie
>>>>
>>>> My point here Stephanie is that this entire mess is a result of *both*
>>>> parties screwing the pooch for *years and years and years*. The
>>>> republicans win by a land slide and they *think* they have a mandate,
>>>> they don't, people were sick and tired of what the dems were doing. The
>>>> dems win by ands land slide and well, you finish the sentence.
>>>> They have us right where they want us, squabbling about this party did
>>>> that and the other party did this.
>>>> News flash, BOTH PARTIES are doing US.!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Did I ever say I was a democrat? There are some republicans I am OK with
>>> too. Overall I think NONE of them are representing us. I guess I just
>>> feel
>>> Obama has my interests more at heart than GWB ever did.
>>>
>>> BTW GWB won by the smallest margin in history yet claimed a "mandate".
>>>
>>Not the first time around. Obama has only Obamas interest at heart. Wait
>>and see.
>
> Yeah, he's figuring if he gets enough things done for the good of the
> country it'll all pay off in sweet sweet public adulation. And that's
> when the chicks start lining up! Yeah!!
>
> Please.
Gee wish I'd have thought of that