From: Bill Graham on

"Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote in message
news:4b3a6f23$0$19443$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com...
> "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:nfWdnRbWLfIB-afWnZ2dnUVZ_hednZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>
>
> <snip>
>>Certainly, I am willing to watch other news services than Fox. (for
>>example) But, I find it discouraging that others will refuse to watch
>>Fox....:^) Or, when I mention that my source for some fact was Fox news,
>>they will dismiss it out of hand by disparaging the source, rather than
>>consider the truth/falsity of the fact in question.
>
> Faux Noise will report objectively, about as many times as a blind
> squirrel finds an acorn in the deep woods.
> I don't know about you, but my time is limited. That doesn't mean I only
> get my news from the left. I do try to strike some balance. When I hear
> the source, I try to verify and think whether the presented fact makes
> sense. I would give my eye teeth to hear a debate between Rachael Maddow
> and Bill O'Reilly. (Although he has been invited several times, O'Reilly
> has never accepted an invitation to debate.)
> Interestingly, Karl Rove's divorce got less coverage on Fox than Tiger's
> problems.
>
>
> --
> Peter
> Somehow, for some reason I don't trust or believe Rush.
>

weg9 says: Funny.....Bill O'reilly is always offering to debate Rachael
Maddow on his show, and is always "turned down". Maybe we should sponsor an
independent forum where we can get these people together to debate one
another on neutral ground......:^)

From: Bill Graham on

"Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote in message
news:4b3a6f23$0$19443$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com...

> Interestingly, Karl Rove's divorce got less coverage on Fox than Tiger's
> problems.

weg9 says: That's not surprising. Tiger's problems have been on all the
news and comedy agendas for the last month now, and nobody has mentioned
Karl Rove or his problems.....There are just some people who are newsworthy,
and some who are not. Did Karl Rove back his Caddy into a tree too?

From: Peter on
"Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
news:7IGdnUxy6Zxc7qfWnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>
> "Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4b3a6f23$0$19443$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com...
>
>> Interestingly, Karl Rove's divorce got less coverage on Fox than Tiger's
>> problems.
>
> weg9 says: That's not surprising. Tiger's problems have been on all
> the news and comedy agendas for the last month now, and nobody has
> mentioned Karl Rove or his problems.....There are just some people who are
> newsworthy, and some who are not. Did Karl Rove back his Caddy into a tree
> too?
>


Isn't he the guy that masterminds political campaigns based upon "family
values." or is that a different Karl Rove?
Some are good at selecting appropriate double standards.


--
Peter
Do as I say, not what I do.

From: Peter on
"Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ab2dnfwRirEs76fWnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>
> "Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4b3a6f23$0$19443$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com...
>> "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:nfWdnRbWLfIB-afWnZ2dnUVZ_hednZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>>
>>
>> <snip>
>>>Certainly, I am willing to watch other news services than Fox. (for
>>>example) But, I find it discouraging that others will refuse to watch
>>>Fox....:^) Or, when I mention that my source for some fact was Fox news,
>>>they will dismiss it out of hand by disparaging the source, rather than
>>>consider the truth/falsity of the fact in question.
>>
>> Faux Noise will report objectively, about as many times as a blind
>> squirrel finds an acorn in the deep woods.
>> I don't know about you, but my time is limited. That doesn't mean I only
>> get my news from the left. I do try to strike some balance. When I hear
>> the source, I try to verify and think whether the presented fact makes
>> sense. I would give my eye teeth to hear a debate between Rachael Maddow
>> and Bill O'Reilly. (Although he has been invited several times, O'Reilly
>> has never accepted an invitation to debate.)
>> Interestingly, Karl Rove's divorce got less coverage on Fox than Tiger's
>> problems.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Peter
>> Somehow, for some reason I don't trust or believe Rush.
>>
>
> weg9 says: Funny.....Bill O'reilly is always offering to debate Rachael
> Maddow on his show, and is always "turned down". Maybe we should sponsor
> an independent forum where we can get these people together to debate one
> another on neutral ground......:^)



My place, or yours?
We would sell a lot of tickets. Let's rent Safeco Field for the occasion.


--
Peter

From: Bill Graham on

"Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote in message
news:4b3a80f8$0$19448$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com...
> "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:7IGdnUxy6Zxc7qfWnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>
>> "Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote in message
>> news:4b3a6f23$0$19443$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com...
>>
>>> Interestingly, Karl Rove's divorce got less coverage on Fox than Tiger's
>>> problems.
>>
>> weg9 says: That's not surprising. Tiger's problems have been on all
>> the news and comedy agendas for the last month now, and nobody has
>> mentioned Karl Rove or his problems.....There are just some people who
>> are newsworthy, and some who are not. Did Karl Rove back his Caddy into a
>> tree too?
>>
>
>
> Isn't he the guy that masterminds political campaigns based upon "family
> values." or is that a different Karl Rove?
> Some are good at selecting appropriate double standards.
>
>
> --
> Peter
> Do as I say, not what I do.

Yeah.....That's the guy.....He's got his own website:
http://www.rove.com/