From: Chris H on
In message <IuKdnfy1dNe7blXWnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, Bill Graham
<weg9(a)comcast.net> writes
>Put me down for not wanting it....I have bought and paid for my own
>health care all of my working life, while my contemporaries have spent
>their excess money on fast cars and women. Now they can die on the
>street for all I care.....How about them apples?

So you are not an American then....

--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



From: Chris H on
In message <hqbebm$3vq$2(a)news.albasani.net>, "stephe_k(a)yahoo.com"
<stephe_k(a)yahoo.com> writes
>Savageduck wrote:
>> On 2010-04-16 13:27:18 -0700, "Neil Harrington" <never(a)home.com> said:
>
>>>
>>> More projection. You'll have to do a lot more twisting and turning
>>>than that
>>> to get all that egg off your face.
>> It was not my face which got splattered in this exchange.
>> Your initial attempt at ridicule is what did not quite work out.
>>Just because you find the term "homophobia" inapprotiate, does not
>>make it invalid.
>>
>
>I wonder if Neil has noticed NO ONE has backed him up on anything he
>has said here, yet he still believes 99% of the world thinks like he
>does...

I have seen people argue this way before: You are ALL wrong! EVERYBODY
supports me... it is just a quirk of fate that none of them are here.
Ask in the real world...

Then of course unless you can give an Internet URL that these people
approve of it is all "liberal bias" and just propaganda.

I have noticed that 99% (:-) of this sort of person also believe that
the BBC, CNN and the other mainstream media are in a conspiracy and ONLY
Fox news knows the truth.....


--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



From: tony cooper on
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:59:42 +0100, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org>
wrote:

>In message <hqbebm$3vq$2(a)news.albasani.net>, "stephe_k(a)yahoo.com"
><stephe_k(a)yahoo.com> writes
>>Savageduck wrote:
>>> On 2010-04-16 13:27:18 -0700, "Neil Harrington" <never(a)home.com> said:
>>
>>>>
>>>> More projection. You'll have to do a lot more twisting and turning
>>>>than that
>>>> to get all that egg off your face.
>>> It was not my face which got splattered in this exchange.
>>> Your initial attempt at ridicule is what did not quite work out.
>>>Just because you find the term "homophobia" inapprotiate, does not
>>>make it invalid.
>>>
>>
>>I wonder if Neil has noticed NO ONE has backed him up on anything he
>>has said here, yet he still believes 99% of the world thinks like he
>>does...
>
>I have seen people argue this way before: You are ALL wrong! EVERYBODY
>supports me... it is just a quirk of fate that none of them are here.
>Ask in the real world...

What a hypocrite you are! This is *exactly* your style of making a
point...this assumption of what "most" think or do.

--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: David Ruether on

"Stuffed Crust" <pizza(a)spam.shaftnet.org> wrote in message
news:4bc9221e$0$10523$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...>
In rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Bill Graham <weg9(a)comcast.net> wrote:

>> I am not blaming her.....There is only one thing to blame, and that is the
>> god damned liberal democrats, who are really socialists in sheep's clothing.

> If they're socialists, they're damn incompetent ones -- real socalists
> would have given us universal, single-payer health care.

8^) "The term "socialist", used by the right so thoughtlessly for indicating
something they consider "inherently really icky", is VERY often misapplied
to Democrats (kinda one of those indications of rigidity of thought and the
presence of strong bias, facts be damned...).

>> answer my letters....Try emailing Nancy Pelosi sometime, if you want an
>> exercise in futility.....We don't have a representative any more in this

> Well, I have no reason to mail her, she's not my rep in congress.
> Instead, I have Bill "Birther" Posey (R), who isn't likely to be
> re-elected, and doesn't even bother to send me the "loookee what I"ve
> done for you!" mailers.
>
> - Solomon

Well, I do email my two US senators and my NY representative,
and all three respond with (ostensibly...;-) personal emails, and
they are generally to my points. They are Senators Gillibrand and
Schumer, and Representative Hinchey - all superb, in my opinion.
Even though my income is very small (consisting almost entirely of
"gov'mint" social security - which, BTW, *is* my money, now
being paid back to me monthly as long as I live, even if I live to
110...;-), I gave $50 to Senator Gillibrand when she was at risk of
being opposed in the primary. I also make a yearly contribution
to the ACLU, since its work is to help preserve and defend the
US Constitution in addition to civil liberties, rather important
work that.
--DR


From: David Ruether on

"Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
news:isudnfCS16YWdVXWnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d(a)giganews.com...

> ...There is only one thing to blame, and that is the god damned liberal democrats, who are really socialists in sheep's clothing.
> they are the Robin Hooders who want to take the personal responsibility away from the people and turn them into a bunch of welfare
> puppies....The Barney Franks, Chris Dodd's, and Nancy Pelosi's that I have hated all of my adult life.....People like Diane
> Feinstein and Barbara Boxer. They don't even answer my letters....Try emailing Nancy Pelosi sometime, if you want an exercise in
> futility.....We don't have a representative any more in this country. We are being run by a bunch of fellow travelers who make
> separate laws for us to follow, and won't even talk to us........This country is heading for a revolution....I only wish I could
> be around to see it (and help it) happen.

Y I K E S ! ! !
Sheesh, why don't you just try voting, huh? Stop
complaining that some people DID win 'cuz a majority
of us REALLY DID WANT THEM TO! So now you
are into overthrowing our elections?!?!? STUPID! And,
BTW, if you got thousands of letters, could you answer
them all, or even a lot of them, especially in detail, and
especially if they were generalized, "philosophical", and
maybe bordering on hate mail types? Get real... And,
BTW, so long as you are civil, you can actually visit your
representatives (either in DC, or when they visit their
local headquarters) since they do have office hours and
then say what's on your mind in person (which should
preferably be constructive, and not just a blast like the
above). Work for candidates you like, and contribute to
them, and don't be such a "baby" if your candidate loses!
Also BTW, often revolutions result in REAL tyranny,
since the institutions that protected the people are swept
away. Try thinking some, instead of just reacting with
prejudices...
--DR