From: Bill Graham on

"Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message
news:2010041019143129560-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom...
> On 2010-04-10 19:04:33 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> said:
>
>>
>> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message
>> news:2010041011005078840-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom...
>>> said:
>>
>>> I consider myself to be a centrist, I lean to the left on social issues,
>>> to the right on fiscal issues, and I have seen the best and worst of
>>> crime & Law enforcement, leading me to be fair and mostly unbiased as an
>>> investigator.
>>> ...and I was brought up with guns, which I feel have been unfairly
>>> blamed for the actions of criminals. I can only agree that some degree
>>> of control needs to be implemented, but not the unreasonable knee jerk
>>> reaction we see from those with little understanding of our gun culture.
>>
>> But you still insist on interpreting the Constitution only to suit your
>> own purposes. You like the second amendment, but you want to take away a
>> bartenders right to operate his bar for smokers, and refuse to allow him
>> to put a sign on his door saying that there is second hand smoke going on
>> inside, and please go down the block to some other bar if you don't like
>> it.
>>
>> If I insist on misusing guns, and endangering myself and others by
>> shooting them in inappropriate places, that's my fault, and not the fault
>> of the guns or the other people who own and use them, but if I insist on
>> going into someone else's bar and breathing second hand smoke, then it's
>> the fault of the establishment's owner, and not my own stupidity......How
>> can you resolve these two different positions?
>
> ...and there he is.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Savageduck
>

Q.E.D.

From: Savageduck on
On 2010-04-10 19:36:09 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> said:

>
> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message
> news:2010041019185370933-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom...
>> On 2010-04-10 18:47:56 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> said:
>>
>>>
>>> "Neil Harrington" <never(a)home.com> wrote in message
>>> news:zvOdndeIttnCAl3WnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>>>
>>>> For the most part that's all well and truly said, though you certainly
>>>> fell off the sidewalk with Fox News. But then it slipped my mind that
>>>> you are a leftist-"liberal" -- you show such good sense in other areas
>>>> it's hard for me to keep that in mind.
>>>>
>>>> How you can not like a network with Megyn Kelly, Carl Cameron, Steve
>>>> Doocy, Margaret Hoover, Martha McCollum, Jane Skinner, et al., is more
>>>> than I can understand. (I'll grant you a couple of the more prominent
>>>> guys there are annoying, but I suppose that's "fair and balanced" for
>>>> you.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, but there is more logic in what these guys say than there is in
>>> anything ever said by Brian Williams and Katie Kurick. Savageduck is
>>> using his, "Kill the messenger" method of disparaging the facts, since
>>> he can't logically refute what they say.
>>
>> Bill,
>> I learned a long time ago, there is no point in arguing with you. You
>> have your opinion tattooed across your forehead. If you choose to get
>> you information from undoubtably questionable sources such as Beck,
>> Hannity, O'Reilly, et al, so be it.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Savageduck
>>
>
> Strange....I watched channel 8 news (NBC) for three hours
> yesterday........I wonder when was the last time you watched Fox news
> for three hours? What? - Never, you say?
>
> I wonder who is getting their news from questionable sources.......

Why? I ask, would anyone watch any news channel for three hours?
Did you have bad weather keeping you indoors up there in Oregon yesterday?

Darn it Bill! You are absolutely on target. I have never had a reason
to watch Fox news, or any other news channel for 3 hours. I guess I
have other things to do.

Though I can think of one, or two exceptions when I was glued to the
news for hours, when there were compelling events which were
undeniable, such as the events of September 11, 2001. ...and even then
I didn't watch Fox.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

From: tony cooper on
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:13:09 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net>
wrote:

>I am where I am today by being convinced of
>many things by people who were smarter than I was.

You are Reginald Perrin and ICMFP.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: Savageduck on
On 2010-04-10 21:16:37 -0700, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> said:

> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:13:09 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I am where I am today by being convinced of
>> many things by people who were smarter than I was.
>
> You are Reginald Perrin and ICMFP.

I don't think he knows who Regginald Perrin is.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

From: tony cooper on
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:03:25 -0700, Savageduck
<savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:

>On 2010-04-10 21:16:37 -0700, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> said:
>
>> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:13:09 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am where I am today by being convinced of
>>> many things by people who were smarter than I was.
>>
>> You are Reginald Perrin and ICMFP.
>
>I don't think he knows who Regginald Perrin is.

If responses to Graham's posts were required to be about things that
Graham understands no one would be able to respond to his posts.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Prev: a portrait - Ellen DeGeneres
Next: iPad practical jokes