From: Peter on
"Neil Harrington" <never(a)> wrote in message
> Peter wrote:

>> You obviously know nothing about family law.
> I don't, and that's a fact.

Thank you for your intellectual honesty. At least we can disagree without
beng disagreeable.

>> Look up rights of dower & courtesy. Hint, most states have laws
>> codifying these rights.
>> Check community property states. Maybe then, you will know what is
>> referred to.

When you have time look up the above. It will open your eyes to the rights
gays don't have.


From: David J. Littleboy on

"tony cooper" <tony_cooper213(a)> wrote:
> On Tue, 04 May 2010 11:12:51 -0400, "J. Clarke"
> <jclarke.usenet(a)> wrote:
>>What do you believe to be the basis for the state having an interest in
> The basis is the law of the state. To be married, the couple must
> apply to the state for a license to do so. If the state won't grant a
> marriage license, then the couple cannot legally marry.

ROFL. That is just soooooooooooo gloriously circular.

David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan

From: Ray Fischer on
Neil Harrington <never(a)> wrote:
>GOEBBELS?! I'm reasonably sure that Goebbels, like his leader, was left
>wing. In other words, YOUR kind of people, Duck.

And harrington takes a lesson from Goebbels and resorts to the Big
Lie. Nazis were extreme right wing and it is only American fascists
who try to claim that the nazis were the socialists that they hated.

Ray Fischer

From: Bill Graham on

"Peter" <peternew(a)> wrote in message
> "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)> wrote in message
> news:feqdnRdL4qPZMELWnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d(a)
>> Yes, and our government has defined marriage, so all non-felons should be
>> allowed to participate in it. <snip>
> In what State are felons not permitted to marry?
> --
> Peter
I was speaking of the general fact that constitutional rights are available
to all non felons......Marriage is, or at least should be, a constitutional
right, since the government has added it to their IRS form 1040......

From: Ray Fischer on
Neil Harrington <never(a)> wrote:
>> Doctors, not insurance companies should control medicine.
>Yes, within reasonable limits.

Smirk. Rightards are ever eager to impose government or coroporations
between doctor and patient.

> Some conditions are astronomically expensive
>to treat, and the money has to come from somewhere. Insurance companies on
>average have only about a 3.5% profit margin,

Rightard disinformation. It's actually double that.

Ray Fischer