Prev: Got a light tent - what lamp-s should I get
From: John Bean on 13 Aug 2010 13:39
In article <Vr2dnbS0YowL6fjRnZ2dnUVZ7tWdnZ2d(a)bt.com>,
nospam(a)spacecadet.com says...
>
> Chris H wrote:
> > In message <epha66tbqmheukpim15c2iau1eh3hqksnd(a)4ax.com>, Geoff Berrow
> > <blthecat(a)ckdog.co.uk> writes

> >> I suppose it will still be around as long as movie film makers keep
on
> >> using it.
> >
> > AFAIK They all went digital a few years ago.

> No, they didn't. 35mm is still the main medium of origination and
> distribution.

Even if true (and I don't dispute it) cine stock isn't the same medium -
neither base nor emulsion - used for 35mm still cameras. If making 35mm
cine stock is still economic there's no implication that 35mm still
camera stock would be.

I suspect there's not much "Hollywood" stuff originated on film stock -
35mm or otherwise - these days but I'd be very surprised if there
weren't lots of 35mm prints made for distribution.

--
John Bean
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Got a light tent - what lamp-s should I get