Prev: GFCI
Next: ICF
From: pluton on
Hi all,

I think it is well known that so far in Illustrator, the position of
an arrowhead is pretty difficult to control. If I create a line and
then add an arrowhead through the usual Effect -> Stylize -> Add
Arrowhead, the arrowhead itself will not be positionned at the very
end of the line and will go further. Has it been corrected in
Illustrator CS5 or is there a trick unknown to me?

Thanks
From: dorayme on
In article
<69e4bb8a-bd64-4e8b-b540-7032c3de2aeb(a)y30g2000yqh.googlegroups.co
m>,
pluton <plutonesque(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I think it is well known that so far in Illustrator, the position of
> an arrowhead is pretty difficult to control. If I create a line and
> then add an arrowhead through the usual Effect -> Stylize -> Add
> Arrowhead, the arrowhead itself will not be positionned at the very
> end of the line and will go further. Has it been corrected in
> Illustrator CS5 or is there a trick unknown to me?
>

I would assume most would simply make the line a bit shorter at
the end you are going to put the arrow on. The idea of an arrow
is to point forwards and it would be a rare situation where the
space between the end of the arrow and the thing being referenced
was a critical thing. So there is plenty of leeway in practice.
Why would you so precisly need to "control" such a thing?

--
dorayme
From: steggy on
pluton schreef:
> Hi all,
>
> I think it is well known that so far in Illustrator, the position of
> an arrowhead is pretty difficult to control. If I create a line and
> then add an arrowhead through the usual Effect -> Stylize -> Add
> Arrowhead, the arrowhead itself will not be positionned at the very
> end of the line and will go further. Has it been corrected in
> Illustrator CS5 or is there a trick unknown to me?
>
> Thanks


From what I read the use of arrows in CS5 is totally different and much
better. It is now part of the Stroke palet.

Not sure if the problem you address is solved. Until now it's a huge and
very irri problem when you make schemes and graphs.
From: pluton on
>  From what I read the use of arrows in CS5 is totally different and
much
> better. It is now part of the Stroke palet.

maybe good news then. I will investigate


> Not sure if the problem you address is solved. Until now it's a huge and
> very irri problem when you make schemes and graphs.

yes, I agree, this is very annoying. Dorayme, when you want to
indicate dimensions, radii or anything like that
on a schematic, it is not always easy to control with your eyes and
make the line shorter.
I am a big user of the grid and having the mentionned trouble soved
would make my life
much easier. That is why I am slowly moving to PStricks, which is
kindda a programming method
for schematics

From: dorayme on
In article
<e5942974-29a7-4d75-8b55-d28f82017c49(a)r1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com
>,
pluton <plutonesque(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> > �From what I read the use of arrows in CS5 is totally different and
> much
> > better. It is now part of the Stroke palet.
>
> maybe good news then. I will investigate
>
>
> > Not sure if the problem you address is solved. Until now it's a huge and
> > very irri problem when you make schemes and graphs.
>
> yes, I agree, this is very annoying. Dorayme, when you want to
> indicate dimensions, radii or anything like that
> on a schematic, it is not always easy to control with your eyes and
> make the line shorter.

No, OK, I realised later I use arrows for very simple purposes
and obviously this is not for everyone... Doubtless you would
know all tricks to work around the failing you point out...

--
dorayme
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: GFCI
Next: ICF